NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

                                                                                                NEW DELHI

 

ORIGINAL PETITION NO. 168  OF  1996

 

Chandi Prasad Bhatt                                                                         Complainant                

            Vs.

British Airways                                                                                 Opposite Party

 

BEFORE:

                        HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.P. WADHWA,

                                                                          PRESIDENT

                        HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MEHRA, MEMBER.

                        MR. B.K. TAIMNI, MEMBER.

 

1.  Denied Boarding  (DNB) compensation -  usual story of overbooking as per international practice  bona fide passenger holding  valid ticket denied boarding on account of overbooking not provided any compensation or hotel accommodation.

 

2.  Flown in the next flight by upgrading the ticket - awarded  a sum of Rs.22,500/- as damages to cover the cost of hotel accommodation and other charges

 

 

 

            O R D E R

 

 

DATED THE       28th     November, 2002

 

JUSTICE D.P. WADHWA, J.(PRESIDENT)

 

                        Complainant, who was to go to  Mexico to attend  an international conference between  13.4.96 to 22.4.96,  held a confirmed ticket  of British Airways departing from  Indira Gandhi International Airport on 13.4.96 at 12.30 AM.   Because of overbooking of the aircraft, complainant was denied boarding.  In this complaint complainant has  made a claim for Rs. 25.00 lakhs as compensation as he  said that he suffered loss and injury to his professional standing and reputation in the international community  and also for the mental anguish, harassment and inconvenience he suffered on that account.

                        Such type of claim is not maintainable in a case where a passenger, though holding a confirmed ticket,  is denied boarding due to over booking.     In the case of denied boarding in similar circumstances this Commission has already given two judgments viz.  Dr. Arun Jain vs. Thai Airways International Ltd.  (Original Petition No.80 of 1997) decided on  21st March, 2002 and Rajinder Pal Jaura  vs. The Secretary,  Union of India & Anr. (Original petition No.266/97) decided on 12th November, 2002. In these cases this Commission  has held that  over booking is an international practice resorted to by all  international airlines.   In fact  in the  folder of the ticket issued to the complainant he had been apprised of the circumstances of  “No-Show” Passengers and Overbooking  and these we quote:

                        “No-Show - Passengers

 

On most  major airlines, including British Airways, a proportion of passengers  who have booked seats do not present themselves for their flight.  These passengers are known as  ‘no shows’.   Their number varies from route to route but may be substantial.

                       

If you have a booking on one of our flights but know that you are not going to be able to travel on that flight, please let us know as early as possible.   Knowing that you are not going to use your reservation, we can then offer the seat to another  customer who otherwise would be unable to travel.   Remember that one day you may be the passenger needing a reservation on an already fully-booked flight.

 

Overbooking

 

In order to minimise the effect of  ‘no-shows’, and  to enable their seats to be used by passengers who otherwise would not be able to travel on their chosen flight, British Airways, and most major airlines may overbook services.  By careful monitoring and control we do our utmost to match the number of available seats to the number of passengers that we expect will appear  for the  flight.

 

Whilst British Airways makes every effort to provide seats for which confirmed reservations  have been made, no absolute   guarantee of seat availability is denoted by the expression reservation, bookings, status OK and the timings attached to them.

                       

British Airways operates compensation schemes for passengers with confirmed  reservations who are unjustifiably denied carriage because of non-availability of seats and details of these schemes are available at check-in.

                       

If you have any questions about our overbooking or denied boarding compensation policy, please write to Customer Relations Manager, British Airways, P.O. Box 10, London Heathrow airport, Hounslow, Middlesex TW6 2JA”

 

                        Complainant it appears when he was denied boarding, he immediately left the airport and sent a notice through his legal advisor to the opposite party- British Airways on 13.4.96 which was received by the British Airways on the same day.   Complainant was flown by the British Airways on the night of 14.4.96, the aircraft departing at 12.30 AM.

                        In the notice the complainant required the British Airways to ensure that he is allowed to catch flight  “to-night or tomorrow” to travel to Mexico via London.   It is stated by British Airways that though the complainant  was holding economy class, he was upgraded  to  ‘J Class” (Executive class) which was done with a view to compensate him of his being denied boarding and  as a gesture  of goodwill  for the inconvenience caused to him.   It has been further stated by British Airways that when in the circumstances of overbooking a passenger is denied  boarding he is accommodated in a Hotel and facilities of food, drinks and telephones are provided.  There was no request from the complainant for any of these facilities as it appears he left the airport.   It is stated that in the alternative British Airways also paid  Pound Sterling 150 as denied  boarding compensation to the passengers.

                        We do not think that the payment of  Pound Sterling  150 can only be is in the alternative.  The international practice is to provide both  Hotel accommodation etc. and to fly out the passengers on the first available flight   and apart from that  to pay compensation ranging   US $ 300 to   $ 400.  We are of the view that a passenger who is denied boarding should be  offered Hotel accommodation etc. and also paid compensation and it is not that  it should be done  only on his request.  A passenger may decline  Hotel accommodation etc. but he should be apprised of the offer.

                        In the present case complainant is certainly entitled to one day’s Hotel accommodation  and also compensation which in  our opinion  Pound Sterling  200 which will be equivalent to  US $ ranging between  $ 300 to $ 400  should have been given.  Since we have not been told as to what would be  the cost of one day’s stay in  a Hotel in Delhi and other charges which the passenger might have to incur, we fix a sum of Rs.5,000/- as proper  expenses for that purpose.    We are of the view  now a sum of Rs.22,500/= as compensation will meet the ends of justice.     Accordingly we allow this complaint  to  this extent  with cost of Rs.5000/-.  The amount of Rs.22,500/- would carry interest @ 12% per annum from 1.5.96 till payment.

 

……………………………………J

(JUSTICE D.P. WADHWA)

                      PRESIDENT

                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                       

………………………………………J

(J.K. MEHRA)

                   MEMBER

                                   

                                                                                   

………………………………………

(B.K. TAIMNI)

                       MEMBER