NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

NEW  DELHI

 

CONSUMER  COMPLAINT  NO.           82          OF          2006

 

Atul Nanda & Anr.                                                  …        Complainants

Versus

Reserve Bank of India & Ors.                              …        Opposite Parties

 

 

BEFORE :

                        HON’BLE  MR. JUSTICE  M.B. SHAH,  PRESIDENT

                        HON’BLE  MRS. RAJYALAKSHMI  RAO,  MEMBER

                        HON’BLE  MR. ANUPAM  DASGUPTA,  MEMBER

 

 

For the Complainant         :           Mr.Atul Nanda, in person

 

For the Opp. Parties          :           Mr.C.Mukund, Advocate for OP 1

 

Mr.S.L. Gupta and Mr.R.K. Dikshit, Advocates for OP 3,18,21,36-39,41,43,69

 

Mr.Anand K. Mishra, Advocate for OP 4, 10, 14

 

Mr.P.B. Aggarwala and Ms.Praveena Gautam, Advocates for OP 6, 60

 

Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate for Mr.V.K. Tandon, Advocate for OP 7

 

Mr.Debasis Mukherjee, Advocates for OP 12

 

Mr.Rambir Singh and Mr.Kunal Tandon, Advocates for OP 13

 

Mr.Krishna Mohan, Advocate for Mr. R.N. Rout, Advocate for OP 15

 

Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate for Mr.Saran Suri, Advocate for OP 16

 

Mr.T.C. Tiwari, Advocate for Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Advocate for OP 19

 

Dr.Sunil Narula, Advocate for OP 20

 

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate for OP 22, 32 and 57

 

Mr.Kanishka Ahuja, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Monga, Advocate for OP 23, 29

 

Mr.Dharam Dev and Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocates for OP 25, 55

 

Ms.Lubna Arif, Advocate for OP 26

 

Ms.Lata Sharma, Advocate for OP 30 and 33

 

Mr.P.I. Jose, Advocate for OP 40 and 47

 

Mr.D.P. Chaturvedi, Advocate for OP 44

 

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate for OP 48

 

Mr.Devendra Sain, Advocate for OP 49

 

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for OP 51

 

Mr.Jayendra Manocha, Advocate for OP 52

 

Ms.Ananya Kumar, Advocate for OP 67

 

Mr.P.S. Shetty, Advocate for OP 73

 

Mr.Nirmal Mishra, Advocate for OP 76

 

Mr.Dileep and Ms.Deepti, Advocates for OP 88 and 90

 

12.05.2008

 

O R D E R

 

            At the request of learned counsel for various Banks, adjourned to 26th May 2008 at 11.30 A.M. for giving them opportunity to file necessary affidavits on the question posed in our order dated 21.4.2008, which is as under :

“Whether a consumer, who suffers in case when the cheque deposited by him for collection of amount is honoured by the drawer bank (say on 1.4.2008) and the information is received by the drawee bank (say on 15.4.2008), should get interest or whether no interest is payable to him by either of the banks (either drawer or the drawee bank) because it is a transit loss?”

 

            Learned counsel for the Banks are directed to supply a copy of the affidavit to the learned counsel for the RBI at least 2 days in advance.

 

 

……………………………………….J.

( M.B.  SHAH)

PRESIDENT

 

…………………………………………

(RAJYALAKSHMI  RAO)

MEMBER

 

…………………………………………

(ANUPAM  DASGUPTA)

MEMBER

/sra/  15  / Court-1