NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
Opposite Party
BEFORE :
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. SHAH,
PRESIDENT
MRS. RAJYALAKSHMI RAO,
MEMBER
For
the Complainant : Mr.Atul
Nanda, Advocate
For
the Opp. Parties : Mr.C.Mukund,
Advocate with Mr.Shashank
Sharma, Ms. Neeraj,
and Mr.Aneesh Garg,
Advocates for OP 1 (RBI)
Mr.S.L. Gupta, Advocate & Mr. R.K. Dikshit Advocate for Opp. Parties
3,18,21,36,37,38,39,41,43,69
Mr.Harsh Jha and Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Advocates for OP 4
Mr.R. Majumdar, Advocate for OPs 5, 10, 14
Ms. Praveena Gautam, Advocates for OP 6, 60
Mr.V.K. Tandon, Advocate for OP 7
Mr.Pradeep Dewan, Mr.Anupam
Dhingra, Advocates for OP 8
Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate for OP 9
Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharya,
Sr.Advocate with Mr. Sudarshan
Rajan, for OP 12
Mr. Rambir Singh and Mr.Kunal Tandan, Advocates for OP
No.13
Mr. R.N. Rout, Advocat and
Mr. B.N. Patra
Advocate for OP 15
Mr. Saran Suri, Advocate
for OP 16
Mr.H.D. Talwani, Advocate for OP
17
Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Advocate for OP
19
Dr.Sunil Narula, Advocate for OP 20
Ms.Richa Choudhary, Advocate for OP
22, 32 and 57
Mr.Ajay Monga, Advocate for OP 23, 29
Mr.Dharam Dev, Advocate for OP 25, 55
Mr. Abhishek Kumar,
Advocate for OP 26
Mr. S.S. Salooja, Advocate
for OP 27
Mr.Rajender Kumar, Advocate for OP 30 and 33
Mr.P.S. Shetty, Advocate for OP
35
Ms.Deepti and Mr.P.I. Jose, Advocates for OPs 40
and 47
Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi,
Advocate for OP 44
Mr. S.K. Garg, Advocate for
OP 45
Mr. Dveep Ahuja, Advocate with
Mr. V. Ramakrishna, Manager (Legal) for OP 46
Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate for OP 48
Mr.Devendra Sain, Advocate for OP 49
Mr.K.J. Naik and Mr.Subhash Chand, Advocates for
OP 51
Mr.J.Pradhan, Advocate for OP 52
Mr. K.K. Mani, Advocate for
OP 54
Mr.Manoj Arora, Advocate for OP 56
Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for OP 63
Ms. Nirmal Mishra, Advocates for OP 76
Mr.Manish Khandelwal, Advocate for
OP 79
Ms.Surekha Raman, Advocate for OP 88 and 90
21.05.2007
Heard the learned counsel
for the parties.
I. Application dated
18.5.2007 filed by the complainant, be treated as a separate complaint, which
will be heard along with this complaint.
Leave to amend the said application, by mentioning proper addresses of
the Banks involved in the alleged Electronic Transfer, is granted.
Notice on the new complaint (i.e.,
application dated 18.5.2007) to RBI, SBI, ICICI Bank, Corporation Bank and UCO
Bank returnable on
II. For the local cheques, it has been pointed out that most of the Banks who
have filed affidavits and have stated that credit and debit of the cheques is being given or would be given on the same
day.
In view of the aforesaid affidavits
and the stand of the RBI, RBI to consider
and decide whether appropriate guidelines can be issued for this purpose.
III. Regarding outstation cheques, RBI may find out solution so that there may not be
any floating of money for a longer time.
Stand over to
J.
(M.B. SHAH)
(RAJYALAKSHMI RAO)
MEMBER
/sra/ 22
/ Court-1